ABSTRACT
Background@#In worldwide, 16.9 million cases of stroke were reported in 2010. It has increased by 68% since 1990. In 2016, there were 5.5 million deaths attributable to cerebrovascular disease worldwide (2.7 million deaths from ischemic stroke and 2.8 million deaths from hemorrhagic stroke). Furthermore, dysphagia is one of the most common complication and occurs 35-78% of patients with stroke. Specifically, dysphagia occurs in 51-100% of the brain stem stroke patients. Moreover, it could be the independent factor to predict mortality. In other words, it directly impacts the quality of life and decreases social activity. </br> Incidence of cardiovascular disease and stroke have been increasing related to instability of economy, urbanization, bad lifestyle and stress. As a result of that, dysphagia has increased as well and is becoming one of the pressing issue of health care. It results malnutrition and prolonged the hospital stays. Unfortunately, its diagnosis and treatment are still not clearly defined yet. </br> Many researchers have investigated patients’ treatment outcome using a single treatment. In other word, researchers have studied the comparison of the separate results of electric stimulation and traditional swallowing therapies. In this study, we studied the results of combination therapy of traditional swallowing and muscle stimulation, and we aimed to identify the benefits of the combined therapeutic approach and to propose the effective, non-invasive methods for patients.@*Objective@#We aimed to study treatment outcome and quality of life among stroke patients with dysphagia.@*Material and Methods@#The study was conducted on a hospital-based, cross-sectional method. Study participants were obtained from Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolian University for the Nationalities between July 2018 and March 2019. All patients were divided into the three treatment groups. 150 dysphagic patients were evaluated by Swallowing Related Quality of Life (SWL-QOL) Scale before and after the treatment.@*Results@#In total, 150 participants (mean age=59.70±9.55 years) aged between 34-77 were obtained in this study. There were no statistically significant differences between the three groups in age (p=0.609).The data showed statistically significant positive treatment effect for all three groups (p=0.0001).The SWAL-QOL score was 39.25±3.50 in A group, 39.10±3.54 in B group, 42.12±4.55 in C group after the treatment. The SWAL-QOL score shows statistically significant difference, after the treatment (p=0.0001). @*Conclusions@#Rehabilitation treatment combined with neuromuscular electrical simulation appears better outcome than nerve or muscular stimulation combined with rehabilitation among stroke patients with dysphagia.
ABSTRACT
Background. Low back pain is a frequently encountered symptom. Although 70-80% of the entirepopulation have low back pain complaints in their lives, only 2-4% of them require surgical intervention.’Department of Neurosurgery, Shastin 3rd Central Hospital about 200 patients who undergo back surgery,while 90% of patients who have prolapsed lumbar disc surgery from 2010 to 2012. There are variousstudies indicating that exercise improves pain and disability in chronic low back pain and in those whohave had surgery. The main objectives of the postoperative rehabilitation programmes are to accelerateand maximize function recovery as much as possible, and to prevent further injury by restricting theprogression of degenerative changes. We evaluated the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatments thatare used in our department which is the first time in our country.Goal. To evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation after lumbar discectomy.Materials and Method. We examined 83 patients were included the Shastin central hospital, Departmentof neurosurgery and rehabilitation after lumbar discectomy at a single level and operated in the periodfrom May 15, 2013 to September 15, 2014. All patients were evaluated at the beginning and at theend of treatment by Oswestry Disability Index which is a specific functional questionnaire for back pain.Pretreatment values are one month after surgery and posttreatment values three months after surgery.All patients received the intensity specific exercise and back school education programme 3 days aweek for eight weeks.Results. All patients pain intensity are reduced after treatment evaluated by VAS (p<0.000). Functionalability had significantly increased after treatment which is evaluated by Oswestry Disability Index in allpatients (p<0.000). 46 from all patients had minimal disability before treatment and this number wasincreased in to 79 after treatment. The number of moderate and severe disabled patients ability wasincreased after treatment.Conclusion: Back school education and specific exercise programme should be one of the parts oftreatment after lumbar discectomy. After treatment was increased functional ability and early painrelief.
ABSTRACT
Background. Cerebral palsy (CP), which is the most commonly encountered neuromuscular disorder of childhood, causes permanent physical deficits and sometimes intellectual deficits. Despite advances in the diagnosis and treatment of CP, the incidence of that disorder has not declined; it parallels the increased survival rates of premature infants. The children with CP may not have trunk control because they have spasticity and weakness in their trunk control. Goal. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation (FES) application on the abdomen-posterior back muscles in children with Cerebral palsy (CP). Materials and Methods. However 40 children with spastic CP, being treated in physical therapy, were selected by the way of random-sampling in the study, some of children were excluded by exclusion criteria and then 30 children have completed the study. The participants were randomly divided into two groups FES (n=15) and control groups (n=15). The control group received physical therapy 3 days a week in 45 minute for 6 weeks. The children in the FES group received physical therapy in addition to function electrical stimulation. FES was applied 5 days a week for 6 weeks to abdomen-posterior back muscles in 30 minute-long sessions. To evaluate the score of gross motor function measurement (GMFM) and to evaluate the trunk asymmetry in sitting, radiographic measurements were used. Result. The comparisons of the measurements of the two groups before and after the treatment showed that the GMFM standing score were statistical significantly (p<0.001) increased, and Cobb angles were decreased both groups, but the decrease in the control group was not statistically significant (p=0.128), and FES group was statistically significant (p=0.033). The comparison between groups GMFM standing score increased higher in the FES group than in the control group. Cobb angles after the treatment were statistically significant higher in the FES group than in the control group. Conclusion: To improve gross motor developing for children with CP, FES applied on abdomenposterior back muscles along with physical therapy is more effective than physical therapy alone.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: We aim to determine rehabilitation physicians’ attitudes toward and awareness of evidence-based medicine (EBM), level of knowledge and its usage, and barriers to implement it. Design: Cross-sectional survey from a questionnaire distributed in 2010. Setting: The rehabilitation physicians that participated in nation-wide rehabilitation congress in Mongolia. Participants: 58 rehabilitation physicians who responded to a questionnaire (77.3% response rate). Main outcome measures: Rehabilitation physicians’ attitudes toward EBM, level of knowledge and understanding of related technical terms of EBM, clinical use of EBM, level of awareness of and access to EBM literature and databases, and barriers to implementing EBM. Results: Most of the respondents had a positive attitude toward EBM; 91.4% agreed that the use of evidence in practice was necessary; 87.9% agreed that EBM improved patient care; 94.7% were interested in improving the skills necessary to implement EBM. Respondents had a low level knowledge of EBM. Only 39% of the respondents had been trained in EBM, and reported a low level of awareness of some of the technical terms. The practice of evidence-based medicine by a rehabilitation physician was insufficient. Most respondents obtained information of evidence that was necessary for practice from a textbook. Higher than half of the respondents stated they read fewer than 2 articles in a typical month. The primary barrier to implementing EBM was lack of research skills. Conclusion: The respondents had a positive attitude towards EBM and were interested in improving the skills necessary to implement EBM. In the future, the importance of EBM and medical statistics in undergraduate education is suggested. In addition, measures for EBM skill improvement among rehabilitation physicians is of urgent necessity.
ABSTRACT
Purpose. Differences in language and literacy impede our understanding of the impact of disability around the world. Since function is primarily action, the computer-animated Language Independent Functional Evaluation (L.I.F.E.) might bypass the use of written or verbal scales. This study validates L.I.F.E. in a developing world population. Methods. Families were randomly chosen from the city centre, suburban ‘ger’ districts and countryside of Arvaikheer, Mongolia. The L.I.F.E. and cross-translated Mongolian Barthel Index were administered in random order. Demographics including subjective observation of disability were gathered. L.I.F.E. scores were converted to Barthel equivalents. Results. One hundred sixty eight persons completed the test. Persons with observed disability had lower L.I.F.E. scores (64.55 vs. 94.53, p<0.001). L.I.F.E. and Barthel scores related well. (Spearman’s rho=0.757, p<0.001; for persons with observed disability Pearson r=0.820, p<0.001). Individual functions all had high interclass correlations (40.75), except bowel and bladder, which had moderate correlations. Qualitative inquiry found the L.I.F.E. was preferred over the Barthel. Conclusions. Using L.I.F.E., function can be measured without language or literacy. L.I.F.E. expands our ability to measure and compare the prevalence of disability and the impact of rehabilitation across regions perhaps leading to more rational allocation of resources.